A noção de riscos online infantojuvenis no âmbito da educação em saúde
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60114/rbtf.v14i1.155Palavras-chave:
Riscos, Mídias digitais, Construção social, Prevenção, InfantojuvenilResumo
No presente estudo, discorro sobre a perspectiva da construção social dos riscos nas interações de crianças e jovens com os meios digitais. Desenvolvo a compreensão de que a noção de riscos infantojuvenis online não deve ser guiada por categorias fixas nem reificantes, sejam da psicologia individualista tradicional, sejam da medicalização. Ao final, introduzo a perspectiva dos efeitos diferenciais das mídias e a importância crucial de explorar os três Cs: qual criança; qual conteúdo; e em quais contextos? Essas duas óticas (da construção social e dos efeitos diferenciais das mídias) podem enriquecer a educação em saúde sobre tais riscos online, contribuindo para uma visão nuançada e abordando a multidimensionalidade envolvida nessa temática.
Referências
Anderson, H. (2009). Conversação, linguagem e possibilidades: um enfoque pós-moderno da terapia. Roca.
Anderson, H. (2012). Collaborative practice: a way of being “with”. Psychotherapy and Politics International, 10(2), 130-145. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppi.1261
Anderson, H. (2020). El paraguas posmoderno: el lenguaje y el conocimiento como relacionales, generativos, e inherentemente transformadores. In Adela G. Garcia (Ed.), Terapia colaborativa: relaciones y conversaciones que hacen una diferencia (pp. 31-43). WorldShare Books.
Austen, L. (2009). The social construction of risk by young people. Health, Risk and Society, 11(5), 451-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570903183871
Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: how the internet is changing the way we read, think and remember. Atlantic Books.
Comitê Gestor da Internet no Brasil (2020). Executive summary: Survey Kids Online Brazil 2019. Comitê Gestor da Internet no Brasil. Retrieved from https://cetic.br/media/docs/publicacoes/2/20201123093630/executive_summary_ict_kids_online_2019.pdf
Fox, N. (1999). Post-modern reflection on “risk”, “hazards” and life choices. In D. Lupton (Ed.), Risk and sociocultural theory: new directions and perspectives (pp. 12-33). Cambridge University Press.
Gergen, K. J., Lightfoot, C., & Sydow, L. (2004). Social construction: vistas in child and adolescent psychology. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33(2), 389-399. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3302_21
Guan, S. S., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2009). Youth Internet use: risks and opportunities. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 22(4), 351-356. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0b013e32832bd7e0
Harden, J., Backett-Milburn, K., Scott, S., & Jackson, S. (2000). Scary faces, scary places: children’s perceptions of risk and safety. Health Education Journal, 59(1), 12-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/001789690005900103
Lauricella, A. R., Wartella, E., & Rideout, V. J. (2015). Young children’s screen time: the complex role of parent and child factors. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 36, 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.12.001
Lightfoot, C. (1997). The culture of adolescent risk-taking. The Guilford Press.
Lubeck, S., & Garrett, P. (1990). The social construction of the “at‐risk” child. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 11(3), 327-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569900110305
Lupton, D. (1993). Risk as moral danger: the social and political functions of risk discourse in public health. International Journal of Health Services, 23(3), 425-435. https://doi.org/10.2190/16AY-E2GC-DFLD-51X2
Lupton, D. (1999). Risk and sociocultural theory: new directions and perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
Moore, T., McArthur, M., Heerde, J. A., Roche, S., & O’Leary, P. (2016). Our safety counts: children and young people’s perceptions of safety and institutional responses to their safety concerns. A report for the royal commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse. Retrieved from https://www.ehn.org.au/uploads/244/175/Our-safety-counts.pdf
Petersen, A., & Wilkinson, I. (2008). Health, risk and vulnerability. Routledge.
Sampasa-Kanyinga, H., & Lewis, R. F. (2015). Frequent use of social networking sites is associated with poor psychological functioning among children and adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 18(7), 380-385. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0055
Scott, S., Jackson, S., & Backett-Milburn, K. (1998). Swings and roundabouts: risk anxiety and the everyday worlds of children. Sociology, 32(4), 689-705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038598032004004
Spink, M. J. P., Medrado, B., & Mello, R. P. (2002). Perigo, probabilidade e oportunidade: a linguagem dos riscos na mídia. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 15(1), 151-164. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-79722002000100017
Strassburger, V. C., Wilson, B. J., & Jordan, A. B. (2011). Crianças, adolescentes e a mídia (2a ed). Artmed.
Tulloch, J. (1999). Fear of crime and the media: socioculture theories of risks. In D. Lupton (Ed.), Risk and sociocultural theory: new directions and perspectives (pp. 34-58). Cambridge University Press.
Tursz, A. (1993). Des diverses approches du risque a l’adolescence. Journal Adolescence et Resque, 135-152.
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 221-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12024
Zimmermann, G., & Quartier, V. (2014). Construction identitaire et relations familiale à l’adolescence à l’áune de intersubjectivité. In C. Moro, N. Müller-Mirza & P. Roman (Eds), L’intersubjectivité en question: agrégat ou nouveau concept fédérateur pour la psychologie? (pp. 301-321). Antipodes.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Candido Barros
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
