Pragmática da comunicação humana: revisitando um clássico

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60114/rbtf.v13i1.151

Palavras-chave:

Comunicação humana , Teoria relacional sistêmica, Linguística, Clínica psicoterapêutica

Resumo

O artigo revisita Pragmática da comunicação humana, de Paul Watzlawick et al. (1967), obra fundamental na teoria relacional sistêmica, por dois olhares: revisões recentes de Janet Bavelas (2021; 2022) sobre a obra; e estudos contemporâneos do campo linguístico. Ao levar em conta o diálogo com os estudos linguísticos, o artigo aproxima duas áreas — psicologia clínica e linguística —, a fim de expandir os conceitos de comunicação humana. A releitura feita por Bavelas (2021; 2022), fundamentada em estudos contemporâneos da linguística, sinaliza para a importância de se considerar a multifuncionalidade, a multimodalidade e a ambiguidade como pilares das interações humanas, incluindo no contexto clínico.

 

Referências

Ameka, F., & Terkourafi, M. (2019). What if ...? Imagining non-Western perspectives on pragmatic theory and practice. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 72-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.04.001

Bateson, G., Jackson, D. D., Haley, J., & Weakland, J. H. (1956). Toward a theory of schizophrenia. Behavioral Science, 1(4), 251-264. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830010402

Bavelas, J. B. (2007). Writings with Paul. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33(3), 295-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00027.x

Bavelas, J. B. (2021). Pragmatics of human communication: 50 years later. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 40(2), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1521/jsyt.2021.40.2.3

Bavelas, J. B. (2022). Face-to-face dialogue: Theory, research, and applications. Oxford University Press.

Bühler, K. (2011). Theory of language: The representational function of language. Trans. Donald Fraser Goodwin. Benjamins.

Bunt, H. C. (2010). Multifunctionality in dialogue and its interpretation. Computer Speech & Language, 25(2), 222-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2010.04.006

Burge, T. (2001). Paul Grice. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. Recuperado de https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/grice/

Caton, S. C. (1987). Contributions of Roman Jakobson. Annual Review of Anthropology, 16, 223-260. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.16.100187.001255

Chomsky, N. (1965). Cartesian linguistics. Harper and Row.

Del Rio, C. M. (2012). Book review: Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. The Family Journal, 20(3), 342-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480712449802

Elias, C. M. (2019). Watzlawick, Paul. In J. L. Lebow, A. L. Chambers & D. C. Breunlin (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy (pp. 3143-3144). Springer.

Fishman, J. (1990). What is reversing language shift (RLS) and how can it succeed? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 11(1-2), 5-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.1990.9994399

Glock, H.-J., & Kalhat, J. (2018). Linguistic turn. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Vol. 1). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/0123456789-DD3600-1

Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489-1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Studies in syntax and semantics III: Speech acts (pp. 183-198). Academic Press.

Huang, R. (2020). A study of intentional ambiguity from the perspective of pragmatics. Open Access Library Journal, 7(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106182

Hymes, D. H. (1967). Models of the interaction of language and social setting. Journal of Social Issues, 23(2), 8-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1967.tb00572.x

Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Jackson, D. D. (Ed.). (1968a). Communication, family and marriage (Human communication, Vol. 1). Science & Behavior Books.

Jackson, D. D. (Ed.). (1968b). Therapy, communication and change (Human communication, Vol. 2). Science & Behavior Books.

Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. In T. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350-377). Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

McElvenny, J., & Knobloch, C. (2023). From Sprachtheorie to semantics and cybernetics: Karl Bühler’s “Pocketbook on practical semantics”. Language & Communication, 93(251), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2022-0046

Nerlich, B., & Clarke, D. D. (2001). Ambiguities we live by: Towards a pragmatics of polysemy. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00132-0

Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. Routledge.

Pennycook, A., & Makoni, S. (2019). Innovations and challenges in applied linguistics from the Global South. Routledge.

Pickens, J. (2019). Beavin, Janet. In J. L. Lebow, A. L. Chambers & D. C. Breunlin (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy (pp.223-225). Springer.

Severo, C. G., & Görski, E. (2023). Sociologia da linguagem e sua relação com a macro e a microssociolinguística. Fórum Linguístico, 20(4), 9028-9042. https://doi.org/10.5007/1984-8412.2023.e92717

Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J. B., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. W. W. Norton & Company.

Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (1973). Pragmática da comunicação humana: um estudo dos padrões, patologias e paradoxos da interação (Trans. A. Cabral). Cultrix.

Wiltschko, M., Denis, D., & D’Arcy, A. (2018). Deconstructing variation in pragmatic function: A transdisciplinary case study. Language in Society, 47(4), 569-599. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740451800057X

Downloads

Publicado

2025-09-29

Como Citar

Gorski Severo, C. (2025). Pragmática da comunicação humana: revisitando um clássico. Revista Brasileira De Terapia Familiar, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.60114/rbtf.v13i1.151

Edição

Seção

Artigos